Medical Writing Writing for Lay Audiences Patient education accessibility
mew-150pxjpg

Volume 24, Issue 4 - Writing for Lay Audiences

Patient education accessibility

Abstract

Patient education that overcomes literacy barriers supports quality care. This article provides an overview of health literacy, describes the concepts of readability and accessibility, and discusses how to empathise with the patient's experience and ask interactive questions. The tips in this article are based on a learner-centred approach and 20 years of publishing X-Plain® patient education tutorials. This information should help health content writers facilitate patient comprehension, improve health outcomes, and achieve care goals set by healthcare providers.

Download the full article

References

  1. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs. Report on the Council of Scientific Affairs. Chicago, IL, US: American Medical Association; 1999.
  2. U. S. Department of Education, National Institute of Literacy. Illiteracy Statistics. 2015 [cited 2 Sep 2105]. Available from: http://www.statisticbrain.com/number-of-american-adults-who-cant-read/
  3. Vernon JA, Trujillo A, Rosenbaum S, DeBuono B. Low Health Literacy: Implications for National Health Policy. Washington, DC: The George Washington University Center for Health Policy Research; 2003.
  4. Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient EducCouns 2006;61:173–90.
  5. Bialik C. Do Readability Formulas Work? The Numbers. The Wall Street Journal. 2008 Mar 13. Available from: http://blogs.wsj.com/numbers/do-readability-formulas-work-297/
  6. Ylvisaker M, Hibbard M, Feeney T. What Is an Advance Organizer? Albany, NY: Brain Injury Association of New York State; 2006 [cited 2 Sep 2015]. Available from: http://www.projectlearnet.org/tutorials/advance_organizers.html
  7. Doak LG, Conrath C, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1996.
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Simply Put: A Guide for Creating Easy-to-Understand Materials, 3rd ed. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/pdf/Simply_Put.pdf
  9. Richards S. Ampersands, Date Ranges and Contractions: Style Guidance; 2014 [cited 2 Sep 2015]. Available from: https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2014/02/25/ampersands-date-ranges-and-contractions-style-guidance-2/
  10. Cornett S. Assessing and Addressing Health Literacy. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 2009;14:3.
  11. Adams RJ. Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2010;3:61–72.
  12. Klein DW, Simon CM, Schartz HA. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial. Genet Med. 2015; Apr 2.
  13. Davis TC, Berkel HJ, Holcombe RF. Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. 2015. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:668–74.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Communicating with and about People with Disabilities. Atlanta, HA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/pdf/disabilityposter_photos.pdf
  15. Strong T. Developmental Disabilities Nurse Certification Review: A Multiple Choice Practice Method from the Knowledge Testing Review Series; 2014.
  16. Na tional Association of the Deaf. Frequently Asked Questions. Question – What is the difference between a person who is ‘deaf,’ ‘Deaf,’ or ‘hard of hearing’? [cited 2 Sep 2015] Available from: http://nad.org/issues/american-sign-language/community-and-culture-faq
  17. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer; 2003.
  18. Malamed C. Realistic Graphics and Learning: What's Most Effective? 2010 [cited 2 Sep 2015]. Available from: http://theelearningcoach.com/media/graphics/realistic-graphics-and-learning/
  19. Hoots PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):173–90.
  20. Wike K. Hospitals ‘Wired’ For Patient Engagement, Data Security. Health IT Outcomes. 24 July 2015. Available from: http://www.healthitoutcomes.com/doc/hospitals-wired-for-patient-engagement-data-security-0001

Search

Articles

Writing for lay audiences
President's Message
Writing for lay audiences: A challenge for scientists
Patient education accessibility
Legislation and the lay audience: Challenges of communicating benefit and risk in the light of new regulations
Medical writing for two audiences – The RMP public summary
Layperson summaries of clinical trial results: Useful resources in the vacuum of regulatory guidance
Package leaflets for medication in the EU: The possibility of integrating patients’ perspectives in a regulated genre?
What do writers need to know about user testing?
Medical journalism: Another way to write about science
Elements of storytelling in medical journalism
A stroll through the medical blogosphere
Writing narrative style literature reviews
News from the EMA
Profile: An interview with Laura Carolina Collada Ali: On the peculiarities of working for independent research organisations
The Webscout
In the Bookstores
Regulatory Writing
Lingua Franca and Beyond
Gained in Translation
English Grammar and Style
Out On Our Own

Member Login

Links

The Write Stuff Archive Contact Instructions for Authors Feature Article Template (Word) Journal Policies

Editoral Board

Editor-in-Chief:

Co-Editor:

Managing Editor

  • Victoria White (Tampa, Florida, USA)
show all +

Associate Editors:

Section Editors:

Ad-hoc Editors:

  • Amy Whereat (SpeaktheSpeech Consulting, Asnieres sur Seine, France)

Editor Emeritus: