Medical communicators can choose words that influence how people perceive individuals and populations who take part in research. For many years, the term subjects was used ubiquitously and internationally in clinical research. However, this term can fuel disrespect, mistrust, and bias in clinical practice and research. As a result, subjects has been increasingly replaced with the more precise and respectful term participants. However, other terms may more accurately and precisely describe people who take part in clinical research while also recognising their contributions, autonomy, humanity, and individuality with respect, empathy, compassion, and kindness.
Medical Writing. 2025;34(2):66–68. https://doi.org/10.56012/wakl7985
Editor-in-Chief
Co-Editors
Managing Editor
Victoria White
Deputy Managing Editor
Alicia Brooks Waltman
Associate Editors
Section Editors
AI/Automation
Biotechnology
Digital Communication
EMWA News
Freelancing
Gained in Translation
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Good Writing Practice
Pablo Izquierdo / Alison McIntosh
In the Bookstores
Publications
Medical Communications/Writing for Patients
Medical Devices
My First Medical Writing
News from the EMA
Pharmacovigilance
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Louisa Ludwig-Begall / Sarah Kabani
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications
Veterinary Writing
Editors Emeritus
Layout Designer
Chris Monk