Volume 22, Issue 4 - Good Pharma

Journal Watch

Author: Stephen Gilliver

Abstract

Download the full article

References

1. Marx W. Journal Impact Factor: “the poor man's citation analysis” and alternative approaches. Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(3):62–3.
2. Bornmann L, Marx W. Evaluating individual researchers’ performance. Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(2):39–40.
3. Steen RG. Journal Impact Factor: baby and bathwater discarded? Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(3):64–5.
4. Allen L, Jones C, Dolby K, Lynn D, Walport M. Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e5910.
5. Pinto N. Common errors to look out for in medical papers. Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(3):68–9.
6. Fonseca M. Does an academic copy-editor require knowledge of statistics? Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(2):46.
7. Baždarić K. Patchwork plagiarism. Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(2):32–3.
8. Steen RG. Authorship: to be or not to be? Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(1):6–8.
9. Wheatley D. On the current presentation of scientific papers: 2. Cutting out clichés. Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(1):13.
10. Ahmed HS, Gasparyan AY. Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it. Eur Sci Editing. 2013;39(1):8–10.