Writing for pharmaceutical or medical device companies: A survey of entry requirements, career paths, quality of life, and personal observations

Steven Walker; Jane Opie; Sophia Whitman; Kristin Hood; Wendy Critchley; Vicki Houle; Michael Todd; Tahin Manjur; Yvonne Anderson; John Gonzalez

Volume 25, Issue 2 - Medical Communication

Writing for pharmaceutical or medical device companies: A survey of entry requirements, career paths, quality of life, and personal observations

Authors: Steven Walker, Jane Opie, Sophia Whitman, Kristin Hood, Wendy Critchley, Vicki Houle, Michael Todd, Tahin Manjur, Yvonne Anderson, John Gonzalez

Abstract

The spectrum of medical writing activities across the pharmaceutical and device industries is vast. We conducted a limited survey of medical writers predominantly working in industry or for agencies to learn of their personal and professional experiences. Our results showed that writers entering the medical communications world came from diverse backgrounds and had a variety of reasons for choosing this career path. Most had a scientific background and were highly qualified. Though at times stressful and involving long hours, medical writing was generally a satisfying and well-rewarded career choice. Several individual responses suggested a lack of appreciation and poor cooperation on the part of some clients and/or authors. Quality of life differed little between pharmaceutical and device employees. While many skills are transferable, those wishing to change focus from pharmaceuticals to medical devices or vice versa may face challenges. Respondents offered a range of advice for new recruits.

Download the full article

References

Korieth K. Demand for medical writing continues to rise. The Centerwatch Monthly. 2008 [cited 2016 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.centerwatch.com/ advertise/sampleMonthly.pdf
Gattrell WT, Hopewell S, Young K, Farrow P, White R, Wager E, et al. Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a crosssectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e010329.
Davis AM. Medical writing for in vitro diagnostics: a different approach for the ‘hidden’ side of healthcare. Medical Writing. 2014;23(3):204-6.
Drummond M, Griffin A, Tarricone R. Economic Evaluation for Devices and Drugs – Same or Different? Value Health. 2009;12(4):402-4.
Storz-Pfennig P, Schmedders M, Dettloff M. Trials are needed before new devices are used in routine practice in Europe. BMJ. 2013;346:f1646.
Pammolli F, Magazzini L, Riccaboni M. The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(6):428-38.
Fargen K, Frei D, Fiorella D, McDougall CG, Myers PM, Hirsch JA, et al. The FDA approval process for medical devices: an inherently flawed system or a valuable pathway for innovation?J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;5(4):269-75.
Bairnsfather S. Results of the 2011 AMWA salary survey. AMWA Journal. 2012;27(2):55-63.
Reeves A, Hamilton S. Cost comparison of salaried and freelance medical writers working in Europe. Medical Writing. 2014;23(3):215-20.
Wager E, Woolley K, Adshead V, Cairns A, Fullam J, Gonzalez J, et al. Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industrysponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey. BMJ Open. 2014;4(4):e004780.

Volume 25, Issue 2 - Medical Communication

Writing for pharmaceutical or medical device companies: A survey of entry requirements, career paths, quality of life, and personal observations

Authors: Steven Walker, Jane Opie, Sophia Whitman, Kristin Hood, Wendy Critchley, Vicki Houle, Michael Todd, Tahin Manjur, Yvonne Anderson, John Gonzalez

Abstract

References

Search

Articles

Links

Editoral Board