Medical Writing Medical Education CME in the Deutsches Ärzteblatt and the development of multiple choice questions for medical educational purposes

Volume 25, Issue 4 - Medical Education

CME in the Deutsches Ärzteblatt and the development of multiple choice questions for medical educational purposes


Continuing medical education (CME) in Germany, as in other countries, is an estab - lished instrument for the delivery of ongoing training in medicine. Since September 2004, Deutsches Ärzteblatt has published 155 CME papers, and, as of the 12th of August 2016, readers have logged on more than three million times to fill out a final evaluation form. The multiple-choice questions included in the CME modules in Deutsches Ärzteblatt have been analysed in a number of studies on medical education and compared with other German-language CME units from other providers. This article will present the mechanisms used at Deutsches Ärzteblatt to improve the quality of our CME units and reveal the aspects of medical education pedagogy that fed into this process.

Download the full article


  1. Bundesärztekammer. Struktur der Ärzteschaft 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 8]. Available from:
  2. Marx C. CME im Deutschen Ärzteblatt: 43 000 Teilnehmer – sehr gute Bewertung. Dtsch Arztebl 2005;102(37):A 2453–6.
  3. Baethge C, Marx C, Griebenow R, Leuschner H. CME in a General Medical Journal: Three-Year Evaluation of CME in Deutsches Ärzteblatt. Teaching Learning Med; 2010;22(3):229-32.
  4. Christ H, Baethge C, Lehmacher W, Loesche P, Griebenow R. Interdisciplinary CME: Is the need evident? Results of the evaluation of CME articles in the Journal of the German Medical Association. J Eur CME 2015; 4: 1-6. view/28331/pdf_13
  5. Kühne-Eversmann L, Nussbaum C, Reincke M, Fischer MR. cme- Fortbildungsangebote in medizinischen Fachzeitschriften: Strukturqualität der MCFragen als Erfolgskontrolle. Am Beispiel der Fachzeitschriften Deutsches Ärzteblatt, deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift und der Internist. Med Klinik 2007;102(12):993-1001.
  6. Stagnaro-Green AS, Downing SM. Use of flawed multiple-choice items by the New England Journal of Medicine for continuing medical education. Med Teach 2006;28(6) :566–8.
  7. Rotthoff T, Fahron U, Baehring T, Scherbaum WA. Die Qualität von CMEFragen in der ärztlichen Fortbildung – eine empirische Studie. Z Ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2008; 101(10): 667–73.
  8. Krebs R. Anleitung zur Herstellung von MC-Fragen und MC-Prüfungen für die ärztliche Ausbildung. Universität Bern. Available from:
  9. Haladyna TM, Rodriguez MC. Developing and validating test items. London: Routledge; 2013.
  10. Drossard S, Kühne-Eversmann L, Bauer D, Fischer M. Strukturqualität von MCFragen in der ärztlichen Fortbildung. Welchen Einfluss hat die Einführung von Qualitätsmaßnahmen? Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA). Graz 26-28 Sept 2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science Publishing House; 2013. DocP05_01 (P05_01).
  11. Öchsner W, Böckers A. [Medical journals as implicit role models for good multiple choice questions: how far have CME tests so far fulfilled formal quality criteria?]. Z. Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2013;107:468–74.



Medical Education
President's Message
Writing for mixed-media training programmes
Lessons from building an accredited medical conference: Design and delivery
Medical education in a medcomms agency
Patient education in clinical trials and throughout the product lifecycle
Writing, publishing, and disseminating a medical review
CME in the Deutsches Ärzteblatt and the development of multiple choice questions for medical educational purposes
Covering a medical advisory board meeting and creating the report or publication: The role of the professional medical writer
Peer review fraud
News from the EMA
Journal Watch
In The Bookstores
The Webscout
Good Writing Practice
Medical Communications
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Profile: An Interview with the organisers of the first Internship Forum
Out on Our Own


The Write Stuff Archive Contact Instructions for Authors Article Template (Word) Journal Policies

Editoral Board


Raquel Billiones


Evguenia Alechine

Jonathan Pitt

Managing Editor

Victoria White

Deputy Managing Editor

Alicia Brooks Waltman

Associate Editors

Anuradha Alahari

Jennifer Bell

Nicole Bezuidenhout

Claire Chang

Barbara Grossman

Sarah Milner

John Plant

Sampoorna Rappaz

Amy Whereat

Section Editors

Daniela Kamir


Jennifer Bell


Nicole Bezuidenhout 

Digital Communication

Somsuvro Basu

EMWA News 

Ana Sofia Correia 

Gained in Translation

Ivana Turek

Getting Your Foot in the Door

Wendy Kingdom / Amy Whereat

Good Writing Practice

Alison McIntosh 

In the Bookstores

Maria Kołtowska-Häggström

Lingua Franca and Beyond

Maddy Dyer


Lisa Chamberlain-James

Medical Communications/Writing for Patients

Payal Bhatia

Medical Devices

Evguenia Alechine

My First Medical Writing

Anuradha Alahari

News from the EMA

Adriana Rocha


Tiziana von Bruchhausen


Clare ChangZuo Yen Lee 

Regulatory Matters

Sam Hamilton

Regulatory Public Disclosure

Claire Gudex

Teaching Medical Writing

Louisa Ludwig-Begall / Sarah Kabani

The Crofter: Sustainable Communications

Louisa Marcombes

Veterinary Writing

Editors Emeritus

Elise Langdon-Neuner

Phil Leventhal

Layout Designer

Chris Monk