Volume 21, Issue 1 - Medical Writing in Oncology

Translation Section

Authors: Gabriele Berghammer, Elise Langdon-Neuner

Abstract

References

1. Deutsches Institut für Normung [DIN]. Translation services – Service requirements; English version of DIN EN 15038:2006–08. Berlin, Germany: Beuth Verlag GmbH; 2006.
2. SAE J2450 Translation Quality Metric Task Force. Translation quality metric – surface vehicle standard. Available from: http://standards.sae.org/j2450_200508
3. Crimson Life Sciences. Medical device labeling survey by Crimson Life Sciences exposes serious translation risks, Reuters, 19 March 2009.
4. European Business Forum. Mead Johnson Nutritionals product recalls (Brief Article) HighBeam Research. (2010 March 4). Available from: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-134816639.html
5. Honert M. Klinik setzte 47 Patienten falsches Gelenk ein. Der Tagesspiegel. Available from: http://www.tagesspiegel.de/
6. Garcia-Castillo D, Fetters MD. Quality in medical translations: a review. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2007;18:74–84.
7. National Standard Guide for Community Interpreting Services. Available from: http://www.multi-languages.com/materials/National_Standard_Guide_for_Community_Interpreting_Services.pdf
8. DuBay WH. The principles of readability. Available from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/bf/46.pdf
9. Huth EJ. How to write and publish papers in the medical sciences. Baltimore, London, Munich: Williams & Wilkins; 1990.
10. Lannon JM. Technical communication. New York, Madrid, Amsterdam: Longman; 2000.
11. Wegner MV, Girasek DC. How readable are child safety seat installation instructions? Pediatrics 2003;111:588–91.
12. Hoppe IC. Readability of patient information regarding breast cancer prevention from the web site of the national cancer institute. J Cancer Educ 2010;25:490–2.
13. Knapp P, Raynor DK, Silcock J, Parkinson B. Performance-based readability testing of participant information for a Phase 3 IVF trial. Trials 2009;10:79.
14. Barrio-Cantalejo IM, Simon-Lorda P, March Cerda JC, Prieto Rodriguez MA. [Grammatical readability of the package leaflets of the medicinal products most widely consumed and generating the highest expense in Spain during 2005]. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2008;82:559–66.
15. Zeiger M. Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education; 1999.
16. Didaoui M. Translation quality: a pragmatic and multidirectional approach. In: Schmitt PAJH (ed.). Translationsqualität. Leipziger Studien zur angewandten Linguistik und Translatologie ed. Frankfurt: Peter Lang; 2006.
17. FDA. Record of Telephone Conversation, Hiberix. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm182111.htm
18. O'Neill M. Who makes a better medical translator: the medically knowledgeable linguist or the linguistically knowledgeable medical professional? A physician's perspective. Am Translators Assoc Scholarly Monogr Ser 1998;X:69–80.
19. Waldo ML. Demythologizing language difference in the academy: establishing discipline-based writing programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
20. Bourelle A. Lessons from Quintilian: writing and rhetoric across the curriculum for the modern university. Available from: http://www.worcester.edu/Currents/Archives/Volume_1_Number_2/CurrentsV1N2BourelleP28.pdf
21. Hall M. Book review on “Demythologizing language difference in the academy: establishing discipline-based writing programs”. Composition Stud 2005;33:137–40.
22. Quintilian. Institutio oratoria (translated by Murphy JJ). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press; 1987.
23. Thielmann W. Deutsche und englische Wissenschaftssprache im Vergleich. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Synchron Wissenschaftsverlage der Autoren; 2009.
24. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/globalization/, 2011.