Medical Writing Medical Writing in Paediatrics Manuscript Writing

Volume 21, Issue 2 - Medical Writing in Paediatrics

Manuscript Writing


Although sometimes maligned, guidelines make manuscript writing easier and increase the chances of getting published. A good set of guidelines can be used as a checklist (many even include checklists) to help organize, write, format and submit a manuscript.

Manuscript writing guidelines are sets of instructions put together by journal editors and other experts to help ensure that all manuscripts attain a uniform level of quality and ethics. Guidelines can also answer questions, help avoid pitfalls, and ensure that the manuscript is in agreement with standard medical writing practice. In this way, guidelines can reduce the chance that your manuscript is rejected and they help save time. Following guidelines can also improve the chances that the results are included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Although guidelines are important, they are not laws. They often have to be adapted to the specific needs of the manuscript. In some cases, guidelines will insist on something that you consider irrelevant. Regardless, they can be of great help in reducing the number of problems and amount of time spent in completing a manuscript.


  1. International Steering Committee of Medical Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Br Med J 1978;1:1334–6.
  2. EASE guidelines for authors and translators of scientific articles to be published in English. 2011 Available from:
  3. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000251.
  4. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–9.
  5. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004;94:361–6.
  6. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100.
  7. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12.
  8. Mary C. EQUATOR network: an umbrella organisation to tackle bias in scientific literature. The Write Stuff 2009;18:37–8.
  9. Jacobs A, Wager E. European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications. The Write Stuff 2005;2005:317–21.
  10. Wager E, Tumas JA, Field EA, Glazer NB, Schulz G, Grossman L. Good publication practice guideline for pharmaceutical companies. Can J Gastroenterol 2000;14:749.
  11. Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D, et al. Research methods & reporting. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 2009;339:b4330.
  12. Milligan N, Jacobs A. GPP2 guidelines: recommendations for good publication practice in biomedical research. The Write Stuff 2010;19:64–5.
  13. CSE's white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications, 2009 Update. 2009 Available from:
  14. Norman ER. Maximizing journal article citation online: readers, robots, and research visibility. Polit Policy 2012;40:1–12.
  15. The London School of Economics and Political Science Available from:
  16. Habibzadeh F, Yadollahie M. Are shorter article titles more attractive for citations? Cross-sectional study of 22 scientific journals. Croat Med J 2010;51:165–170.
  17. The London School of Economics and Political Science. Available from:
  18. Wiley-Blackwell Author Services. Optimizing your article for search engines Available from:
  19. Lengler R, Eppler MJ. Periodic table of visualization methods. Available from:
  20. Lafaye V, Bowling K. The online author's survival guide. Compass Journals, Wiley-Blackwell. Available from:
  21. Vitae Digital Researcher meeting 2012. Available from:
  22. Mollett A, Moran D, Dunleavy P. Using Twitter in university research, teaching and impact activities. LSE Public Policy Group 2011. Available from:
  23. Goldberg CJ. Retraction: virus-specific splicing inhibitor in extracts from cells infected with HIV-1. Science 1999;243(4887):12.
  24. Alberts B. Retraction. Science 2011;334(6063):1636.
  25. Kennedy D. Editorial retraction. Science 2006;311(5759):335.



Medical writing in paediatrics: Children and the future
Message from the President
Challenges of paediatric drug development and impact of paediatric legislation
Writing applications for Paediatric Investigation Plans and waivers
Preparing the Paediatric Investigation Plan application
ADHD: A true neurodevelopmental disorder?
Medicines information for patients: Insights into research and practice for medical writers
The MHRA perspective on the new pharmacovigilance legislation
Are stem cells the future of healthcare?
O, safety, quo vadis?
Crowdpower in the era of ‘health 2.0’
Networking effectively: Essential for being successful in business
The moving image and your business
Forgive me for repeating myself: Self-plagiarism in the medical literature
In the Bookstores
Journal Watch
The Webscout
Manuscript Writing
Regulatory Writing
English Grammar and Style
Out On Our Own

Member Login


The Write Stuff Archive Contact Instructions for Authors Feature Article Template (Word) Journal Policies

Editoral Board



Managing Editor

show all +

Associate Editors:

Section Editors:

Ad-hoc Editors:

  • Amy Whereat (SpeaktheSpeech Consulting, Asnieres sur Seine, France)

Editor Emeritus: