Volume 26, Issue 3 - Observational Studies
Medical Communications
Abstract
Dear all,
In this issue, Rossella Ferrari tackles the elephant in the room – how do medical writers manage to find time for their continuing professional development whilst still keeping their head above water with their ongoing project work?
We all know that it is crucial to keep current with regulations and guidelines, and of course we come to EMWA meetings, take the workshops, and attend EMWA webinars to keep our writing sharp and up to scratch. But what about our disease and therapy area knowledge? Writers lucky enough to work on a suite of documents or in one area for a long period of time have the relative luxury of seeing their knowledge grow and deepen over time and can focus their attention on one topic. However, far more often we have to swap and change between vastly different disease and therapy areas with alarming speed. So how do communications writers in particular stay on top of their game? In this
issue, Rossella explains the common problems faced by MedComms writers trying to keep their continuous professional development up to date, and importantly, she shares some fantastic tips and tricks for helping us all to stay sane whilst juggling far too many different disease areas. These days, I think any steps towards sanity are more than welcome!
Bestest,
Lisa
Download the full article
References
-
Larsen PO, von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 2010;84:575–603.
Available from: http://
-
Garba S, Ahmed A, Mai A et al. Proliferations of scientific medical journals: a burden or a blessing. Oman Med J 2010; 25:311–4.
Available from: http://
-
Druss BG, Marcus SC. Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implication for evidence-based medicine. J Med Libr Assoc 2005;93:499–501.
Available from: http://
-
Gehanno JF, Ladner J, Rollin L et al. How are the different specialties represented on the major journals in general medicine? BMC Med inform Decis Mak 2011;11:3.
Available from: http://
-
Hoffmann T, Erueti C, Thorning S, Glasziou P. The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomized trials and systematic reviews across specialties. BMJ 2012;344:e3223.
Available from: http://
-
Wang X, Chen Y, Yang N et al. Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015;15:74.
Available from: http://
-
Cullis J, Webster AC. How to get the most from the medical literature: keeping up to date in nephrology. Nephrology (Carlton) 2010;15:269–76.
Available from: http://
-
Strayer SM, Shaughnessy AF, Yew KS, Stephens MB, Slawson DC. Updating clinical knowledge: an evaluation of current information alerting services. Int J Med Info 2010;79:824–31.
Available from: http://