Medical Writing Observational Studies RCTs: Can the treatment work? Patient registries: Does the treatment work?

Volume 26, Issue 3 - Observational Studies

RCTs: Can the treatment work? Patient registries: Does the treatment work?


The first part of this article compares the main features of studies based on patient registry data with those of randomised clinical trials, providing a basis for better understanding the differences between the two. The second part details how to report study-specific issues with patient registries, such as study objectives, patient populations,
bias, confounders, missing data, study duration, and gives a few tips on how to improve the credibility of papers based on patient registry data.
Download the full article


  1. Altman DG. What randomized trials and systematic reviews can offer decision makers. Horm Res 1999;51(suppl 1): 36–43. Available from: http://
  2. Carter MJ, Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials. Adv Skin Wound Care 2009;22:316– 24. 3. Available from: http://
  3. Gliklich R, Dreyer N, Leavy M, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. 3rd ed. Two volumes. AHRQ Publication No. 13(14)-EHC111. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2014. Available from:
  4. Smith GCS, Pell JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 2003;327:1459–61. Available from: http://
  5. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J 2004;328:1490. Available from: http://
  6. Gattrell WT, Hopewell S, Young K et al. Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study Br Med J Open 2016;6:e010329. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010329. Available from: http://
  7. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP for the STROBE Initiative; The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–9. Available from: http://
  8. Odeyemi IAO, Dakin HA, O’Donnell RA, Warner J, Jacobs A, Dasgupta P. Epidemiology, prescribing patterns and resource use associated with overactive bladder in UK primary care. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:949–58. Available from: http://
  9. Mo D, Fleseriu M, Qi R et al. Fracture risk in adult patients treated with growth hormone replacement therapy for growth hormone deficiency: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Does it work? How does it work in real life? Patient registries answer these questions. Volume 26 Number 3 | Medical Writing September 2017 | 11 Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:331–8. 10. Available from: http://
  10. Tritos NA, Johannsson G, Korbonits M et al. Effects of long-term growth hormone replacement in adults with growth hormone deficiency following cure of acromegaly: a KIMS analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99(6):2018–29. Available from: http://
  11. Kołtowska–Häggström M, Mattsson AF, Monson JP et al. Does long-term GH replacement therapy in hypopituitary adults with GH deficiency normalise quality of life? Eur J Endocrinol 2006;155:109–19. Available from: http://
  12. Reinehr T, Lindberg A, Koltowska– Haggstrom M, Ranke M. Is growth hormone treatment in children associated with weight gain? Longitudinal analysis of KIGS data. Clin Endocrinol 2014;81: 721–6. Available from: http://
  13. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG et al, for the STROBE initiative. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:W-163–W-194. Available from: http://
  14. Abs R, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Mattsson AF et al. Determinants of cardiovascular risk in 2589 hypopituitary GH-deficient adults – a KIMS database analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 2006;155:79–90. Available from: http://



Observations and Observational Studies
President's Message
RCTs: Can the treatment work? Patient registries: Does the treatment work?
Odd cases and risky cohorts: Measures of risk and association in observational studies
Guidance for the design and analysis of observational studies: The STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies (STRATOS) initiative
Guidelines for disclosing the results from observational trials
Registration and ethics committee approval for observational studies: Current status and way forward
Regulatory submissions of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies
Reporting non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies (NI-PASS)
Patient-reported outcomes: How useful are they?
EMA releases the revised Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Module V – updated guidance on risk management plans
Mentoring tomorrow’s medical writers
ICMJE to mandate data sharing statements
News from the EMA
Journal Watch
Getting Your Foot in the Door
In the Bookstores
Regulatory Matters
Medical Communications
The Webscout
Teaching Medical Writing
Good Writing Practice
Out on Our Own


The Write Stuff Archive Contact Instructions for Authors Article Template (Word) Journal Policies

Editoral Board


Raquel Billiones


Evguenia Alechine

Jonathan Pitt

Managing Editor

Victoria White

Deputy Managing Editor

Alicia Brooks Waltman

Associate Editors

Anuradha Alahari

Jennifer Bell

Nicole Bezuidenhout

Claire Chang

Barbara Grossman

Sarah Milner

John Plant

Sampoorna Rappaz

Amy Whereat

Section Editors

Daniela Kamir


Jennifer Bell


Nicole Bezuidenhout 

Digital Communication

Somsuvro Basu

EMWA News 

Ana Sofia Correia 

Gained in Translation

Ivana Turek

Getting Your Foot in the Door

Wendy Kingdom / Amy Whereat

Good Writing Practice

Alison McIntosh 

In the Bookstores

Maria Kołtowska-Häggström

Lingua Franca and Beyond

Maddy Dyer


Lisa Chamberlain-James

Medical Communications/Writing for Patients

Payal Bhatia

Medical Devices

Evguenia Alechine

My First Medical Writing

Anuradha Alahari

News from the EMA

Adriana Rocha


Tiziana von Bruchhausen


Clare ChangZuo Yen Lee 

Regulatory Matters

Sam Hamilton

Regulatory Public Disclosure

Claire Gudex

Teaching Medical Writing

Louisa Ludwig-Begall / Sarah Kabani

The Crofter: Sustainable Communications

Louisa Marcombes

Veterinary Writing

Editors Emeritus

Elise Langdon-Neuner

Phil Leventhal

Layout Designer

Chris Monk