Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an essential element to demonstrate the value of a health intervention. In many ways, PROs represent the ultimate “real-world” data, yet the drive towards “Big Data” has focused on
routinely collected data from healthcare databases, which often do not include assessments of PROs or the patient voice. Effective planning of PRO publications requires an in-depth understanding of the planned
studies, the opportunities these provide for publications, and how clinicians, patients, and caregivers may contribute as authors to provide validation of results. Mainstream clinical journals and conferences should be targeted wherever possible, considering the availability and objectives of “enhanced publication” options and open access to increase reach, comprehension, and impact. PRO publications must be written in a clear and engaging way, explaining the instrument in simple terms, and addressing the “so what?” question – ideally with an accompanying plain language summary. And PRO publications must always thank the patients.
Editor-in-Chief
Co-Editors
Managing Editor
Victoria White
Deputy Managing Editor
Alicia Brooks Waltman
Associate Editors
Section Editors
AI/Automation
Biotechnology
Digital Communication
EMWA News
Gained in Translation
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Good Writing Practice
In the Bookstores
Publications
Medical Communications/Writing for Patients
Medical Devices
My First Medical Writing
News from the EMA
Freelancing
Pharmacovigilance
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Teaching Medical Writing
Louisa Ludwig-Begall / Sarah Kabani
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications
Veterinary Writing
Editors Emeritus
Layout Designer
Chris Monk