Volume 23, Issue 2 - Regulatory Writing Basics

Recommended procedures for retracting articles: Inadequate and patchily applied? Analysis of a recent article in PLoS One

Author: Stephen Gilliver

Abstract

Download the full article

References

1. Marcus A. Another retraction for former record holder Joachim Boldt. Retraction Watch; 2014 Jan 16 [cited 2014 Feb 5]. Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2014/01/16/another-retraction-for-former-record-holder-joachim-boldt/
2. Editors-in-Chief statement regarding published clinical trials conducted without IRB approval by Joachim Boldt. 2011 Mar 12 [cited 2014 Feb 5]. Available from: http://www.aaeditor.org/EIC.Joint.Statement.on.Retractions.pdf
3. Elia N, Wager E, Tramèr MR. Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e85846.
4. Wager E, Barbour V, Yentis S, Kleinert S, on behalf of COPE Council. Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). COPE; 2009 Sep [cited 2014 Feb 5]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf
5. PubMed. Bethesda: US National Library of Medicine; 2011 [cited 2014 Feb 5]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15144295
6. Wiley Online Library. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011 [cited 2014 Feb 5]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03734.x/full
7. Wiley Online Library. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011 [cited 2014 Feb 5]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03734.x/pdf