How results are reported influences how they are interpreted. Although P values have been granted great importance, they have no clinical interpretation. Rather, they are a measure of chance as an explanation for the results. Their either or interpretation takes attention away from the results themselves – the difference between groups or the effect size–which are more important. Effect sizes are also estimates. Estimates are only useful if they are accompanied by a measure of precision. In medicine, this measure is usually the 95% confidence interval (CI). This article explains the concepts underlying CIs and illustrates how they are more useful than P values in reporting research. As such, journals are increasingly asking for CIs, instead of, or at least in addition to, P values.
Editor-in-Chief
Co-Editors
Managing Editor
Victoria White
Deputy Managing Editor
Alicia Waltman
Associate Editors
Section Editors
Biotechnology
Digital Communication
EMWA News
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Good Writing Practice
Alison McIntosh / Stephen Gilliver
In the Bookstores
Manuscript Writing
Medical Communications/Writing for Patients
Medical Devices
My First Medical Writing
News from the EMA
Out on Our Own
Pharmacovigilance
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Teaching Medical Writing
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications
Veterinary Writing
Editors Emeritus
Lay out Designer
Chris Monk