How results are reported influences how they are interpreted. Although P values have been granted great importance, they have no clinical interpretation. Rather, they are a measure of chance as an explanation for the results. Their either or interpretation takes attention away from the results themselves – the difference between groups or the effect size–which are more important. Effect sizes are also estimates. Estimates are only useful if they are accompanied by a measure of precision. In medicine, this measure is usually the 95% confidence interval (CI). This article explains the concepts underlying CIs and illustrates how they are more useful than P values in reporting research. As such, journals are increasingly asking for CIs, instead of, or at least in addition to, P values.
Editor-in-Chief
Co-Editors
Managing Editor
Victoria White
Associate Editors
Section Editors
Biotechnology
Digital Communication
EMWA News
Gained in Translation
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Good Writing Practice
In the Bookstores
Manuscript Writing
Medical Communications/Writing for Patients
Medical Devices
My First Medical Writing
News from the EMA
Out on Our Own
Pharmacovigilance
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Teaching Medical Writing
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications
Veterinary Writing
Editors Emeritus
Lay out Designer
Chris Monk