Volume 29, Issue 2 - The Data Economy
Rush to publication – What do we have to lose?
Author: Art Gertel
Abstract
Just as the research and development of new drugs requires careful, often painstaking, adherence to empirical processes, the peer-review process and, indeed, the manuscript preparation process, are likewise laborious and time-consuming. The benefits of these are obvious and important, given how critical peer review serves as a “gatekeeper” for the disclosure of new scientific and medical information. However, we must consider weighing the potential value of rapid publication against the potential harm of inadequate vetting (both internal and external) of the final product.
Visit the EMWA website
Search
Articles
Editorial
The data economy: A glossary
Presidents' Messages
EMWA News
EMWA’s newest special interest group: Sustainability SIG
Rush to publication – What do we have to lose?
The value of registry data in the clinical evaluation of medical devices
Big data in clinical research: Present and future
Leveraging standardised data in response to the novel coronavirus outbreak
Biostatistics, data management, and medical writing: A multidisciplinary approach to the development of the CTD integrated summaries
The new value of clinical data in Europe
Unlocking the potential of patient data through responsible sharing – has anyone seen my keys?
COVID-19 contagion, information, and misinformation
"Processing health-related data for scientific research: Is consent an appropriate legitimate ground?"
An interview with Cathal Gallagher of EMA’s Technical Anonymisation Group
A role for medical writers in overcoming commonly held misconceptions around FAIR Data
MyData: Applying human-centric principles to health data
Thriving in the data economy as data-fluent PhD graduates
Digital identifiers in scientific publishing and e-health
Winners of the Geoff Hall Scholarship Essay Competition
News from the EMA
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Medical Devices
Getting your Foot in the Door
Journal Watch
Veterinary Medical Writing
Good Writing Practice
Out on Our Own
Member Login
Links
Editoral Board
Editor-in-Chief:
- Phillip Leventhal (Evidera, Lyon, France)
Co-Editor:
Managing Editor
- Victoria White (Tampa, Florida, USA) Email: MEW@emwa.org
show all +
Associate Editors:
- Anuradha Alahari (PAREXEL International, Paris, France)
- Raquel Billiones (Clinipace, Zurich, Switzerland)
- Barbara Grossman (Hawkeye Medical Limited, Berkshire, UK)
- Joselita T Salita (Freelance, Bremen, Germany)
- Nathan Susnik (Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany)
- Clare (Chi-Chih) Chang
- Jonathan Pitt
Section Editors:
- Alison McIntosh
- Wendy Kingdom (Wendy Kingdom Ltd., Dulverton, UK)
- Lisa Chamberlain-James (Trilogy Writing and Consulting Ltd., Cambridge, UK)
- Maria Koltowska-Haggstrom (Proper Medical Writing Warsaw, Poland)
- Laura Collada Ali (Teksema, Cogne, Italy)
- Hervé Maisonneuve (Freelance, Lyon, France)
- Claire Gudex (University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark)
- Sam Hamilton (Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK)
- Anu Alahari
- Evguenia Alechine
- Kelly Goodwin Burri (Stryker GmbH, Selzach, Switzerland)
- Stephen Gilliver
- Amy Whereat
- Jennifer Clemens
- Karim Montasser
- Somsuvro Basu
Ad-hoc Editors:
- Amy Whereat (SpeaktheSpeech Consulting, Asnieres sur Seine, France)
Editor Emeritus:
- Elise Langdon-Neuner (Medical University of Vienna, Austria)