Medical Writing Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning A survey on current use of software tools for systematic literature reviews
september-2023-mewpng

Volume 32, Issue 3 - Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

A survey on current use of software tools for systematic literature reviews

Abstract

Adoption of the EU Medical Devices Regulations and In Vitro Diagnostics Regulations has led to increased demand for systematic literature reviews. This article reports on a survey investigating the current use of software platforms and tools by regulatory medical writers and others involved in conducting systematic literature reviews. The survey was completed by 125 respondents from 31 countries, evenly spread across different levels of experience. Most respondents use a partially automated (35%) or fully manual process (59%). Familiarity with specific software to conduct systematic literature reviews was low, with most respondents (61%–84%) indicating they were unfamiliar with five software applications and tools. Data extraction was named as both the most time-consuming and error-prone step in the process. Process improvement, improvement of data extraction, and time saving were seen as topics where systematic literature review software could make the most valuable contribution.

Medical Writing. 2023;32(3):48–54. https://doi.org/10.56012/lxrcb5395

Download the full article

Search

Articles

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
From the Editor
President's Message
EMWA News
Regulatory initiatives for artificial intelligence applications: Regulatory writing implications
Digital tools for the clinical evaluation of medical devices: A guide to empower regulatory writers
AI language models are transforming the medical writing space – like it or not!
Narratives for a clinical study report: The evolution of automation and artificial intelligence
Unlocking new efficiencies: How structured content authoring is streamlining the production of clinical documents for the pharmaceutical industry
Can readers spot the AI impostor in healthcare writing?
Essential principles towards improving clinical risk assessment tools: A conversation with Uri Kartoun, PhD
AI-based plagiarism detectors: Plagiarism fighters or makers?
A survey on current use of software tools for systematic literature reviews
Writing reports of modelling and simulation analysis: Our experience in the field of pharmacometrics
AI for medical writers: Friend or foe?
Introducing EMWA’s new AI Working Group
Diversity in clinical trials: It takes a village
News from the EMA
Digital Communication
Medical Communications and Writing for Patients
Good Writing Practice
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Regulatory Matters
Getting Your Foot in the Door
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications

Links

The Write Stuff Archive Contact Instructions for Authors Article Template (Word) Journal Policies

Editoral Board

Editor-in-Chief

Raquel Billiones

Co-Editors

Evguenia Alechine

Jonathan Pitt

Managing Editor

Victoria White

Associate Editors

Anuradha Alahari

Jennifer Bell

Nicole Bezuidenhout

Claire Chang

Barbara Grossman

Sarah Milner

John Plant

Sampoorna Rappaz

Amy Whereat

Section Editors

Daniela Kamir

AI/Automation

Jennifer Bell

Biotechnology

Nicole Bezuidenhout 

Digital Communication

Somsuvro Basu

EMWA News 

Ana Sofia Correia 

Gained in Translation

Ivana Turek

Getting Your Foot in the Door

Wendy Kingdom / Amy Whereat

Good Writing Practice

Alison McIntosh 

In the Bookstores

Maria Kołtowska-Häggström

Lingua Franca and Beyond

Maddy Dyer

Publications

Lisa Chamberlain-James

Medical Communications/Writing for Patients

Payal Bhatia

Medical Devices

Evguenia Alechine

My First Medical Writing

Anuradha Alahari

News from the EMA

Adriana Rocha

Freelancing

Tiziana von Bruchhausen

Pharmacovigilance

Clare ChangZuo Yen Lee 

Regulatory Matters

Sam Hamilton

Regulatory Public Disclosure

Claire Gudex

Teaching Medical Writing

Louisa Ludwig-Begall / Sarah Kabani

The Crofter: Sustainable Communications

Louisa Marcombes

Veterinary Writing

Editors Emeritus

Elise Langdon-Neuner

Phil Leventhal

Layout Designer

Chris Monk