As the EMA refines its requirements for the external publishing of clinical study reports, the workload of medical writing teams is increasing to include robust processes for clinical study report anonymisation. Until now, life sciences firms have played this safe by using heavy content redaction (covering up identifying information with a blue box), but now EMA is encouraging anonymisation over redaction to help maximise data utility while simultaneously mitigating the risk of patient identification. (Anonymisation involves changing identifiers, but they are still readable, such as placing an age of 27 into a band of 20–29). This article explores the issues and considers companies’ options.
Editor-in-Chief
Co-Editors
Senior Editor
Victoria White
Managing Editor
Alicia Brooks Waltman
Associate Editors
Section Editors
AI/Automation
Biotechnology
Digital Communication
EMWA News
Freelancing
Gained in Translation
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Good Writing Practice
Pablo Izquierdo / Alison McIntosh
In the Bookstores
Publications
Medical Communications/Writing for Patients
Medical Devices
My First Medical Writing
News from the EMA
Pharmacovigilance
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Louisa Ludwig-Begall / Sarah Kabani
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications
Veterinary Writing
Editors Emeritus
Layout Designer
Chris Monk