The phenomenon of missing data is ubiquitous in clinical studies. Both the extent of missing data and the structure of missing data can introduce bias into study results and lead to wrong conclusions. Medical writers should be aware of the extent of missing data and should describe the methods used to deal with the issue. This article outlines some of the most commonly used statistical methods for handling missing data. The traditionally used last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) method to fill data gaps is problematic in many ways. It is better to employ a method that reduces bias, such as multiple imputation (MI) or mixed-effects models for repeated measures (MMRM). Clinical study design can also help minimise the quantity of missing data.
Editor-in-Chief
Co-Editors
Managing Editor
Victoria White
Deputy Managing Editor
Alicia Brooks Waltman
Associate Editors
Section Editors
AI/Automation
Biotechnology
Digital Communication
EMWA News
Freelancing
Gained in Translation
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Good Writing Practice
Pablo Izquierdo / Alison McIntosh
In the Bookstores
Publications
Medical Communications/Writing for Patients
Medical Devices
My First Medical Writing
News from the EMA
Pharmacovigilance
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Louisa Ludwig-Begall / Sarah Kabani
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications
Veterinary Writing
Editors Emeritus
Layout Designer
Chris Monk