Volume 24, Issue 4 - Writing for Lay Audiences

Patient education accessibility

Author: Stella Hart

Abstract

Download the full article

References

1. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs. Report on the Council of Scientific Affairs. Chicago, IL, US: American Medical Association; 1999.
2. U. S. Department of Education, National Institute of Literacy. Illiteracy Statistics. 2015 [cited 2 Sep 2105]. Available from: http://www.statisticbrain.com/number-of-american-adults-who-cant-read/
3. Vernon JA, Trujillo A, Rosenbaum S, DeBuono B. Low Health Literacy: Implications for National Health Policy. Washington, DC: The George Washington University Center for Health Policy Research; 2003.
4. Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient EducCouns 2006;61:173–90.
5. Bialik C. Do Readability Formulas Work? The Numbers. The Wall Street Journal. 2008 Mar 13. Available from: http://blogs.wsj.com/numbers/do-readability-formulas-work-297/
6. Ylvisaker M, Hibbard M, Feeney T. What Is an Advance Organizer? Albany, NY: Brain Injury Association of New York State; 2006 [cited 2 Sep 2015]. Available from: http://www.projectlearnet.org/tutorials/advance_organizers.html
7. Doak LG, Conrath C, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1996.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Simply Put: A Guide for Creating Easy-to-Understand Materials, 3rd ed. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/pdf/Simply_Put.pdf
9. Richards S. Ampersands, Date Ranges and Contractions: Style Guidance; 2014 [cited 2 Sep 2015]. Available from: https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2014/02/25/ampersands-date-ranges-and-contractions-style-guidance-2/
10. Cornett S. Assessing and Addressing Health Literacy. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 2009;14:3.
11. Adams RJ. Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2010;3:61–72.
12. Klein DW, Simon CM, Schartz HA. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial. Genet Med. 2015; Apr 2.
13. Davis TC, Berkel HJ, Holcombe RF. Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. 2015. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:668–74.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Communicating with and about People with Disabilities. Atlanta, HA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/pdf/disabilityposter_photos.pdf
15. Strong T. Developmental Disabilities Nurse Certification Review: A Multiple Choice Practice Method from the Knowledge Testing Review Series; 2014.
16. Na tional Association of the Deaf. Frequently Asked Questions. Question – What is the difference between a person who is ‘deaf,’ ‘Deaf,’ or ‘hard of hearing’? [cited 2 Sep 2015] Available from: http://nad.org/issues/american-sign-language/community-and-culture-faq
17. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer; 2003.
18. Malamed C. Realistic Graphics and Learning: What's Most Effective? 2010 [cited 2 Sep 2015]. Available from: http://theelearningcoach.com/media/graphics/realistic-graphics-and-learning/
19. Hoots PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):173–90.
20. Wike K. Hospitals ‘Wired’ For Patient Engagement, Data Security. Health IT Outcomes. 24 July 2015. Available from: http://www.healthitoutcomes.com/doc/hospitals-wired-for-patient-engagement-data-security-0001