Volume 24, Issue 4 - Writing for Lay Audiences

Writing for lay audiences: A challenge for scientists

Author: Joselita T Salita

Abstract

Download the full article

References

1. Fenner M. One-click science marketing. Nature Mat 2012;11:261–263. (Abstract only)
2. Woolson C. Petition calls for lay summaries in ecology journals. Nature 2015;520(7546).
3. Brehm D. MIT News; 1999 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://newsoffice.mit.edu/1999/forum-0224
4. Duke M. How to Write a Lay Summary. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre; 2012. Available from: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/write-lay-summaryonline
5. Shipman M. Soapbox Science; 2012 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://blogs.nature.com/soapboxscience/2012/03/14/the-promise-pitfalls-of-public-outreach-part-3-social-media-taking-science-to-the-people
6. Woolson C. Scientists are cautious about social media. Nature 2015;518(7540).
7. Highfield R. The Royal Society Publishing Blog; 2015 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://blogs.royalsociety.org/publishing/fssc-scientist-layperson/
8. Brownell SE, Price JV, Steinman L. Science communication to the general public: why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ 2013;12(1):E6–E10.
9. Bromme R, Nückles M, Rambow R. Adaptivity and anticipation in expert-laypeople communication. Amer Assoc Artif Intel; 1999. Available from: https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/1999/FS-99-03/FS99-03-003.pdf
10. Bromme R, Jucks R. Wenn Experten und Laien sich nicht verstehen. Psychologie 2003;FJ November(03):20–25.
11. Radford T. Of course scientists can communicate. Nature 2011;469:445.
12. Rowlands G, Protheroe J, Price H, Gann B, Rafi I. Health Literacy Report from an RCGP-led Health Literacy Workshop. 2014. Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/news/2014/june/~/media/Files/Policy/RCGP-Health-Literacy-2014.ashx
13. Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of patient education materials available at point of care. J Gen Internal Med 2012;27(9):1165–1170.
14. Cutts M. Making leaflets clearer for patients. Med Writing 2015;24(1):14–19.
15. Reeves A. Time to make it shorter: plain English in our context. Med Writing 2015;24(1):4–8.
16. Freeman T. Stroppy Editor; 2014 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: https://stroppyeditor.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/physician-explain-thyself-science-english-vs-lay-english/
17. Somerville RCJ, Hassol SJ. Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today 2011;October:48–53.
18. Howell D. The Washington Post; 2008 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/05/AR2008120502959_2.html
19. Kinsella WJ. Problematizing the distinction between expert and lay knowledge. NJ J Comm 2002;10(2):191–207.
20. Rothman J. The New Yorker; 2014 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/why-is-academic-writing-so-academic
21. Kristof N. The New York Times; 2014 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/opinion/sunday/kristof-professors-we-need-you.html?_r=1
22. Research Gate. Research Gate Forum; 2014 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/post/Should_writing_a_textbook_have_equal_weight_to_writing_a_top_tier_article
23. Kuehne LM, Olden JD. Opinion: Lay summaries needed to enhance science communication. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2015;112(12):3585–3586.
24. Dube CE, Lapane KL. Lay abstracts and summaries: writing advice for scientists. J Cancer Educ 2014;29(3):577–579.
25. Munger D. Science Blogs; 2007 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2007/02/01/how-to-report-scientific-resea/
26. Oregon State University Extension and Experiment Station Communications; 2015 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://extension.oregonstate.edu/eesc/how-to/distilling-science-lay-audience
27. Smith M, Ashmore C. The lay summary in research proposals – is it becoming more important? (Poster) [cited 2015 August 1]. Available from: https://www.keele.ac.uk/media/keeleuniversity/ri/istm/documents/posters/Lay_summary_poster_final.pdf
28. Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2010;468:2572–2580.
29. Zamanian M, Heydari P. Readability of texts: state of the art. Theor Prac Language Stud 2012;2(1):43–53.
30. Austin EG. The Economist; 2012 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://www.economist.com/blogs/johnson/2012/01/readability
31. Ness R. Science Careers; 2007 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2007_04_06/caredit.a0700047
32. Parmer J, Baur C. How CDC is promoting a clear communication culture. Med Writing 2015;24(1):9–13.
33. Dienstman C. Philadelphia Ticket; 2015 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://www.phillymag.com/ticket/2015/05/27/local-teens-record-audio-tours-to-get-youth-interested-in-phillys-museum
34. JISC Patients Participate!. Patients Participate! Case Study Report; 2011 [cited 14 July 2015]. Available from: http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/patientsparticipate/files/2011/10/Case-study-report-Final.pdf
35. Lunt I. Ian Lunt's Ecological Research Site; 2012 [cited 2015 July 14]. Available from: http://ianluntecology.com/
36. Nunn E, Pinfield S. Lay summaries of open access journal articles: engaging with the general public on medical research. Learned Publ 2014;27(3):173–184.