Dear Editor,
EMWA and other organisations (eg, AMWA, ISMPP) support the principles of Good Public at - ion Practice (GPP). As a co-author of the recent GPP3 guideline1 and leader of the professional medical writer section, I was concerned by a recent article2 in the latest edition of EMWA’s Medical Writing journal. In their article, Prashant Auti, Rishabh Pandey, and Vatsal Shah (SIRO Clinpharm Pvt Ltd, Thane, India) include a section in which they “…review the important steps in the drafting of a manuscript.”2 At best, their process description is ambiguous. At worst, their process description is clear, but any of your readers who follow it could risk non-compliance with GPP3.
Editor-in-Chief
Co-Editors
Managing Editor
Victoria White
Associate Editors
Section Editors
Biotechnology
Digital Communication
EMWA News
Gained in Translation
Getting Your Foot in the Door
Good Writing Practice
In the Bookstores
Manuscript Writing
Medical Communications/Writing for Patients
Medical Devices
My First Medical Writing
News from the EMA
Out on Our Own
Pharmacovigilance
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Public Disclosure
Teaching Medical Writing
The Crofter: Sustainable Communications
Veterinary Writing
Editors Emeritus
Lay out Designer
Chris Monk